Showing posts with label bush. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bush. Show all posts

Snowjob

Monday, July 14, 2008
KARMA



Yes that is cruel. What is more cruel though is going in front of the American people everyday and lying. So I believe that Karma is in full effect here. I also expect more of this in the future. You can't do as many horrible things as this administration has and escape unscathed. Either way Karma will get them.

Bush Democrats : The Complete List

Monday, June 23, 2008

Just because these people are Democrats does not mean that they deserve their positions. If they can't live up to their Oath, they do not belong in office. Unlike the Republicans who almost always stand by their members regardless of what they have done, Democrats must not follow the Republican standard. If our members are not pulling their weight, they must go, Plain and simple. Our elected officials work for us and regardless of their party affiliation, if they are not voting in our best interests, they must be voted out. No one should be safe because of his or her party affiliation. You work for us or you don't have a seat in Congress. That is how it should be. That is how we can make it. In summary "Don't Vote Democrat, Just Because They Are A Democrat". Research them find out how they voted and how they intend to vote. Not all Democrats are created equal, don't make the mistake of voting the wrong one in.

I know I posted the site that has this, but for those who don't have the time to "click on stuff" here it is. The whole list of Democrats that need to go. Actual page is Here


1. Incumbent Bush Democrats who deserve primary challenges

Below is a list of Democrats who voted wrong on one or more crucial votes. Some are hard-core "Bush Democrats" while others simply join them from time to time.

By publishing this list, we hope to accomplish several goals:

  1. Persuade these Democrats to stop voting with Bush so we don't have to challenge them in a primary. Democrats who reverse their bad votes and genuinely embrace progressive positions will be crossed off our list
  2. Encourage progressive Democrats to run primaries against those who keep voting with Bush

This list began after 59 Bush Democrats voted against the McGovern Amendment on 5/10/2007 on the first key vote to end the war. Those 59 Bush Democrats voted for an endless occupation of Iraq despite overwhelming opposition from Democrats, Independents, and even many Republicans. The list has been modified since then to take account of other key votes since the original Iraq War vote on 10/10/02.

Key to Column Headings:

"B/R" ranks each district on a "Blue/Red" scale where 1=Strong Blue, 2=Leans Blue, 3=Tossup, 4=Leans Red, 5=Solid Red. In theory there is less "risk" in challenging an incumbent in a Blue district than a Red one, because the seat should stay Democratic regardless of who wins the primary. But each district and each race is unique, so that general theory may or may not apply.

"Incumbent" links to a page for each incumbent where you can discuss progressive Democrats who could challenge them in a primary, and other topics related to local political organizing.

"B/N" identifies Members who join the "Bluedog" (B) or "New Democrat/DLC" (N) caucuses. "Bluedogs" claim to support "fiscal responsibility," but these Bluedogs support a war that has already wasted an incredible $434 billion and driven budget deficits to record levels. "New Democrats/DLC" claim to support "national security" but the Iraq War has severely damaged our armed forces, undermined military recruitment, increased global terrorism, and alienated our allies. Those who play a leadership role with either group earn an asterisk (*).

"BDI" is the "Bush Democrat Index" which ranks all Democrats on their overall voting support for George Bush and the Republicans. It is the reverse of the Progressive Punch Index.

"Votes" identifies key votes where these Members voted wrong:

  • ?: (Not in office when vote occurred)
  • A: Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq on 10/10/02 (bad=support)
  • B: Bankruptcy Bill on 5/14/05 (bad=support)
  • M: Military Commissions Act on 9/27/06 (bad=support)
  • I: Iraq Supplemental McGovern Amendment to end the war by 4/08 on 5/10/07 (bad=oppose)
  • R: Andrews Amendment to block Iraq/Afghan funds for military strike on Iran on 5/16/07 (bad=oppose)
  • X: Iraq Supplemental with unenforceable timetable on 7/12/07 (bad=oppose any timetable)
  • W: Warantless Wiretapping on 8/4/07 (bad=support)
  • C: Bi-Partisan Compact on Iraq to oppose any funding cuts 9/26/07 (bad=support)
  • P: "Protect America Act" letter co-signer 2/08 (P voted against Democratic alternative 3/14/08)

"Primary Nominees" lists people whose names have been mentioned. If they are running and have a web site we link to their site. If we consider them priority candidates (whether or not they are running) we make them bold.

Dist B/R Incumbent B/N BDI Votes Primary Nominees
AL-5 4 Bud Cramer
[retiring in 08]
B 2 ABMIRWCP
AR-2 1 Vic Snyder N 49 IXW
AR-4 1 Mike Ross B* 26 ABMIWCP
AZ-5 4 Harry Mitchell b 59 ?IRW
AZ-8 3 Gabrielle Giffords B 79 ?I Jeff Latas
CA-18 3 Dennis Cardoza B 46 ?BI
CA-20 2 Jim Costa B 50 ?BIWC
CA-28 1 Howard Berman
117 AI Rep. Cindy Montanez
Rep. Lloyd Levine
Mike Stettler
CO-2 1

Mark Udall
[running for US Senate]


109 I
CO-3 4 John Salazar B 56 ?BMIRW
FL-2 4 Allen Boyd B* 6 ABMIRWCP Rep. Al Lawson
FL-16 4 Tim Mahoney B 63 ?IR
GA-2 1 Sanford Bishop B 27 ABMIR
GA-8 5 Jim Marshall B 9 ?MIRXW Robert Nowak
Jack Ellis
George Carswell
GA-12 1 John Barrow BN 12 ?MIRXWP Regina Thomas 7/15
GA-13 1 David Scott BN 52 ?BMIR
IA-3 3

Leonard Boswell
[Likely to retire after
IA loses seat in 2010]

B 20 ABMIWP Ed Fallon
IL-3 1 Daniel Lipinski
76 IW Mark Pera
IL-8 4 Melissa Bean BN 37 ?BMIRWP Randi Scheuer
IN-2 3 Joe Donnelly B 29 ?IRW
IN-8 4 Brad Ellsworth B 30 ?IXWP
IN-9 4 Baron Hill B 32 A?IW Gretchen Clearwater 5/6
KS-2 4 Nancy Boyda b 88 ?I
KS-3 3 Dennis Moore BN* 47 ABMICP
KY-6 3 Ben Chandler BN 55 ?BMIW Sen. Ernesto Scorsone
LA-3 3 Charlie Melancon BN 15 ?BMIRWP
MD-2 1 Dutch Ruppersberger
68 ?BI
MD-4 1 Al Wynn
94 AB Donna Edwards
MD-5 1 Steny Hoyer * 83 ABI Paul Pinsky
MN-7 4 Collin Peterson B 3 ABMIW
MO-4 5 Ike Skelton
5 ABI
MS-4 5 Gene Taylor B 1 ABMIXWC
NC-2 2 Bob Etheridge N 48 ABMIW
NC-7 3 Mike McIntyre BN 7 ABMIW
NC-11 3 Heath Shuler B 23 ?IRWP Sen. Martin Luther Nesbitt
Rep. Susan C Fisher
Rep. Ray Rapp
ND-0 4 Earl Pomeroy B 33 ABMIWP
NV-1 1 Shelley Berkley N 67 AIR
OH-6 3 Charles Wilson B 140 ?IW
OH-18 4 Zack Space B 57 ?IRWP
OK-2 4 Dan Boren B 4 ?BMIRXWCP
PA-4 3 Jason Altmire
25 ?IRW
PA-10 5 Chris Carney B 43 ?IRXWP
PA-13 1 Allyson Schwartz N 145 ?BIR Chuck Pennacchio
PA-17 5 Tim Holden B 11 ABMIRXP Sen. Michael O'Pake
SD-0 4 Stephanie Herseth Sandlin BN* 36 ?BMIRWC
TN-4 3 Lincoln Davis B 13 ?BMIWCP
TN-5 1 Jim Cooper B 24 ?BIWP
TN-6 4 Bart Gordon B 18 ABMIW
TN-8 1 John Tanner B 8 ABMIRWCP
TX-9 1 Al Green
167 ?BI Rep. Alma Allen
Rep. Hubert Vo
TX-17 5 Chet Edwards
17 ABMIW
TX-22 5 Nick Lampson B 34 A?IRWC
TX-23 3 Ciro Rodriguez
75 ?IW
TX-27 2 Solomon Ortiz
14 BI Juan Garcia
TX-28 1 Henry Cuellar bN 19 ?BMIRW
TX-29 1 Gene Green
43 AI Sen. Mario V. Gallegos
UT-2 5 Jim Matheson B 10 ABMIXWCP Mayor Rocky Anderson
VA-9 5 Rick Boucher
38 ABI
WI-3 2 Ron Kind N* 66 ABI

2. Republican districts and open seats where progressive Democrats are running against Bush Democrats

Dist B/R Incumbent Progressive Bush Democrat Notes
CO-04 4 Marilyn Musgrave (R) Angie Paccione Betsy Markey Musgrave is an outspoken GOP homophobe and Paccione nearly beat her in 2006. Markey is a former Republican backed by Bush Democrat Ken Salazar.
IL-14 4 Dennis Hastert (R) - retiring John Laesch Bill Foster
OH-02 4 Jean Schmidt (R) Victoria Wulsin Steve Black "Mean Jean" Schmidt is infamous for her vicious attack on the patriotism of former Marine John Murtha (D-PA). Wulsin nearly beat Schmidt in 2006. Black is a Republican running as a Democrat.
WA-08 3 Dave Reichert (R) Darcy Burner Rodney Tom Burner lost to Reichert by only 3% in 2006 after running an outstanding netroots campaign. Tom served two terms as a Republican state representative before switching parties and winning a State Senate seat. Despite his switch, Tom "brags about his Republican past and has a considerable record of financially supporting Republicans and voting for their issues in Olympia."

3. Progressive Democratic incumbents who are being challenged by Bush Democrats

Dist B/R Progressive Bush Democrat Notes
OH-10 1 Dennis Kucinich Rosemary Palmer Kucinich has led the battle against the Iraq War since Bush rolled out his "marketing plan" of pre-war lies in September 2002. Now Palmer is attacking Kucinich because he doesn't support her incoherent "floating timetable for withdrawal."
TN-09 1 Steve Cohen Nikki Tinker Cohen is an outstanding progressive Freshman who won Harold Ford Jr.'s open seat in 2006 by beating cousin Joe Ford Jr. in the Democratic primary and brother Jake Ford in the general election. Religious right ministers want to defeat Cohen because he supported the Hate Crimes Bill H.R. 1592 and they are likely to support Nikki Tinker, Harold Ford Jr.'s former campaign manager, who came in 2nd to Cohen in the 2006 Democratic primary.

I'm Voting Republican

Wednesday, June 18, 2008
This is really funny...




Website

I'm Voting Republican

synthetichuman

Pentagon Tests Unproven Drugs On Veterans

Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Side effects may include suicide???

Al-Maliki Criticizes U.S. Demands to Stay in Iraq

Friday, June 13, 2008
Oh look more news that contradicts what the Bush administration says... As usual

Al-Maliki Criticizes U.S. Demands to Stay in Iraq - washingtonpost.com

Al-Maliki Criticizes U.S. Demands to Stay in Iraq
Iraqi Prime Minister Says Security Talks at Impasse



By Amit R. Paley
Washington Post Foreign Service
Friday, June 13, 2008; 1:43 PM

BAGHDAD, June 13 -- Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki on Friday denounced demands made by the United States to extend the presence of American troops in Iraq, saying that the two sides are deadlocked and far from reaching an agreement.

"We found out that the demands of the American side are strongly violating the sovereignty of Iraq, something we could never accept," Maliki said.

Speaking during a visit to Amman, Maliki for the first time added his voice to the growing chorus of senior Iraqi politicians opposed to U.S. proposals for a status of forces agreement, which would authorize the presence of American troops, and a long-term strategic agreement between the two countries. He said the drafts presented by the American side were unacceptable, but that both parties would continue to work toward a deal.

"The initial drafts that were presented have reached a dead end," Maliki said.

But Maliki specifically rejected two positions that American officials have signaled are nonnegotiable. He said the Iraqis expected the United States to commit to protecting Iraq from foreign aggression, and he ruled out allowing Americans to be immune from prosecution in Iraqi courts.

The Bush administration has said it cannot promise to protect Iraq from foreign aggression without submitting such a commitment to Congress for approval, a step the White House does not wish to take.

The United States initially demanded that both American troops and private contractors be granted immunity, but over the past week Washington has softened its position and dropped its demand for immunity for contractors. Maliki, however, said that was an unacceptable compromise.

"We could not give amnesty to a soldier carrying arms on our ground," he said. "We will never give it."

The United Nations mandate that authorizes the presence of American troops in Iraq is due to expire on Dec. 31, and the U.S. and Iraqi governments are working toward a bilateral agreement to allow American troops to remain.

Although Iraqi politicians have becoming increasingly angered by U.S. demands during the talks, top American officials have insisted that an agreement could be reached by their established deadline at the end of July.

Yet Maliki appeared to dismiss such talk as far too optimistic.

"I am astonished by those who are talking about how close the agreement is to be signed," Maliki said.

BREAKING! Kucinich Introduces 35 Articles of Impeachment Against George W. Bush!

Tuesday, June 10, 2008
It's too bad that this will probably get pushed under the rug. It's sad too because Congress took an Oath to uphold the Constitution. Not an oath to their political career not an oath to their friends or donors but to uphold the Constitution as the law of the land.

Many crimes have been committed and indeed are impeachable, but because of some fear it would be bad for their careers or their next election hopes, they (Congress) let it go on unpunished. It's sad really and in letting these crimes go unpunished they are almost if not as bad as the people that committed the crimes. Why? Because they ignored the law. For their own best interests in both parties cases. Not in the interests of us, our country or our Constitution, but for their own self or individual political parties best interests.

I find this appalling and history will not look back kindly on their inaction, or actions of this administration. If you know it's happening and don't do anything about it, it's just as bad as doing it. Some however are trying to do something about it and I think they deserve our support.

Petition information and link to Story below...



Support Rep. Kucinich's Articles of Impeachment

On Monday, Rep. Dennis Kucinich made history on the floor of the House by reading 35 Articles of Impeachment against President George W. Bush.

At last!!!!!

We've waited years to find one Member of Congress brave enough to stand up for our Constitution, for which generations of Americans have fought and died. We are thrilled and honored that Dennis Kucinich has chosen to be that one genuine patriot.

We congratulate him on his historic leadership, and pledge to do everything in our power to persuade the House to adopt all 35 Articles and put George W. Bush on trial before the Senate of the United States, exactly as the Founding Fathers wanted.

Of course, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (CA-8), Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (MD-5), and Democratic Caucus Chair Rahm Emanuel (IL-5) all remain adamantly opposed to impeachment - despite the overwhelming evidence of High Crimes, including the "Phase II" report by the Senate Intellligence Committee and Scott McClellan's new book.

And when Rep. Robert Wexler (FL-19) called for Judiciary Committee hearings on Kucinich's Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Cheney in January, only 17 Democrats joined them: Neil Abercrombie (HI-1), Tammy Baldwin (WI-2), Michael Capuano (MA-8), Yvette Clarke (NY-11), Lacy Clay (MO-1), Steve Cohen (TN-9), Peter DeFazio (OR-4), Keith Ellison (MN-5), Sam Farr (CA-17), Raúl Grijalva (AZ-7), Luis Gutierrez (IL-4), Barbara Lee (CA-9), Gwen Moore (WI-4), Jim Moran (VA-8), Mike Thompson (CA-1), Ed Towns (NY-10), and Lynn Woolsey (CA-6).

So Kucinich's heroic efforts will be in vain unless we inundate Congress with emails and calls (202-224-3121) showing our full support for Rep. Kucinich's 35 Articles of Impeachment:

Sign Petition : Here

Story on : Democrats.com

The Bush Tapes

Sunday, June 8, 2008
Another great video from humanitainment. This video should motivate everyone to vote.

Which is a good thing.

Mating Habits Of The Lame Duck

Friday, May 30, 2008


What you are witnessing here is the rare photo of the mating habits of the Lame Duck. This display can be witnessed every four to eight years when the Lame Duck is in season. The one pictured above is a very rare species. Lacking in intelligence it gets along by fooling it's prey into believing what it says. Be careful! They are known to be extremely uninformed. Approach with caution.

I Can't Wait For This day

Thursday, May 22, 2008
Why has this not happened yet? I don't get it. I will however celebrate when it finally does happen though. After that they have a President , Vice President, and Cabinet that need the same treatment.